Root canal treatment of a maxillary second molar with two palatal
roots: a case report
Kasra Karamifar1, Shahram Azimi1, Hossien Dashti2
Knowledge of root canal morphology and variations is an essential factor to successful endodontic treatment. The incidence of a separate second palatal root in a maxillary second molar is very rare. The purpose of this case report is to describe the root canal treatment of a maxillary second molar with 4 separated roots and the variations in the internal anatomy of them, especially their palatal portion. A separate second palatal root was diagnosed in the preoperative radiograph. Careful radiograph examination and change in angulations of radiographs seems necessary for detection of normal variations.
Endodontic treatment success depends on eliminating bacteria from the root canal space and preventing reinfection by obturating the root canal and obtaining a sound coronal seal. However, the complexity of the root canal morphology may present a challenge to clinicians for entire root canal debridement. Knowledge of root canal morphology and probable variations is an essential factor to successful endodontic treatment.
Normally, maxillary second molar has a mesiobuccal, a distobuccal, and a palatal root. The presence of two palatal roots in the second maxillary molars is a rare phenomenon 1, 2. Peikoff et al. observed 1.4% of maxillary second molars as having 2 palatal roots3 while, Libfeld and Rotstein reported a 0.4% incidence of 4 rooted maxillary second molars4. Some clinical case reports of extra palatal canals and/or roots in maxillary molars exist 2, 5. Alani 6 , Shin SJ et al. 7 , Barbizam et al. 8, Baratto- Filho et al. 9 , de Almeida-Gomes et al. 10, Ulusoy and Görgül 11, and Deveaux 12 reported maxillary second molars with two palatal roots. Christie et al. reported that they could detect maxillary molars with two separated palatal roots once every 3 years in an intense daily practice1. The aim of the present case report is to describe the root canal treatment of a four rooted maxillary second molar with two palatal and two buccal roots.
A 25-year-old male was referred for root-canal treatment of his maxillary left second molar. The tooth was vital and symptomatic. Subjective and objective assessments were performed. The diagnosis was irreversible pulpitis. Radiographs were taken using XCPDS® (Dentsply Rinn, USA) sensor holder for Cygnus Digital Sensors (Cygnus Technologies LLC, Arizona, USA). In the preoperative radiograph evaluation (Fig. 1), the existence of two palatal roots was suspected. At the first appointment, the tooth was anesthetized and isolated with a rubber-dam and the access cavity was prepared. The working lengths of all canals were determined using the digital radiograph (Fig. 2) and electronic apex locator (Elements, Sybron Endo, Anaheim, CA, USA). Then the pulpectomy of four canals were performed. At the second appointment, one week later, the tooth was asymptomatic and the root canals were biomechanically prepared using RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland) rotary NiTi files. Mesiobuccal (MB) and distobuccal (DB) canals were prepared up to #25 0.06% and distopalatal (DP) and mesiopalatal (MP) were prepared up to #30 0.06%. The canals were irrigated with 2 ml 5.25% sodium hypochlorite between each subsequent file during instrumentation. Smear layer was removed prior to obturation using 17% EDTA for one minute and then irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for one minute. Root canals were dried with multiple paper points and obturated by the cold lateral condensation technique with guttapercha cones (Aria Dent, Tehran, Iran) and AH Plus sealer (De Trey-Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany). A postoperative radiograph was exposed (Fig. 3). Translucent glass post (RTD, St Egreve, France) was placed in distopalatal canal and also two accessory glass posts were placed in mesiobuccal and distobuccal canals and cemented with resin cement (Xeno
Cem Plus, Dentsply-Sankin) (Fig. 4). The tooth was restored with composite core build up material (Lumiglass, St Egreve, France) and post restoration followed by porcelain fused to metal (PFM) crown placement. One year follow up radiograph shows healthy tissues (Fig. 5).
The usual maxillary second molar has one palatal root and two buccal roots. Four rooted maxillary second molar is a rare condition 1, 2, and 13. Alavi et al. 14 as well as Lee 15 couldn't find any maxillary molars with two palatal roots in their studies. However, some authors described few cases of maxillary second molars with 2 palatal roots or canals 2, 5, 10, and 11. Presence of extra canals or roots in the mesiobuccal portion of these teeth is more common 15, 16. Difficulties during endodontic treatment of maxillary second molar are due to its posterior position, superposition of anatomical structures in radiograms (such as zygomatic arch) which leads to failure of diagnosing unusual anatomy. Also, buccal roots of the same tooth could overlap the extra palatal roots, the same as in present case. Thus, tube-shift technique was used to identify the extra palatal root and to avoid the superimpossion of the extra palatal root with buccal roots of the same tooth and the maxillary 3rd molar's roots.
Stone and Stoner reported variations of the palatal root of maxillary molars, such as a single root with two separate orifices, two separate canals and two separate foramina; two separate roots, each with one orifice, one canal and one foramen; a single root with one orifice, a bifurcated canal and two separate foramina 17. Also Christie et al. classified the maxillary molars into three types according to their root separation level and their divergences . In type I, maxillary molars have two well wide long separated roots, while in type II the roots are parallel and separated but shorter than type I and have blunt root apices. In type III, a web of dentin encages the roots except the distobuccal root. Also Barato-Filho et al. 9 reported a case that had a palatal root with two distinct root canals, but it was fused with the mesiobuccal root up to the apical level and suggested this variety as type IV in Christie classification. Race and genetic factors may have an impact on incidence rate of such morphologic variations, but it is almost impossible to get a clear conclusion from few case reports in certain communities and there is no distinct information in the literature. In the present case, the extra palatal root could be detected in the digital radiograph. It can be concluded that, although the radiographs have limitations in giving information but careful evaluation of the radiographs are necessary. Moreover, a good knowledge of internal anatomy and possible normal variations is necessary as missed extra canals or roots could lead to root canal treatment failure. Because of having two well wide separated long palatal roots each with a distinct root canal, this tooth can be classified as type I according to Christie et al. 1 classification.
1. Christie WH, Peikoff MD, Fogel HM. Maxillary molars with two palatal roots: a retrospective clinical study. J Endod 1991, 17:80-4.
2. Benenati FW. Maxillary second molar with two palatal canals and a palatogingival groove. J Endod 1985, 11:308-310.
3. Peikoff MD, Christie WH, Fogel HM. The maxillary second molar: variations in the number of roots and canals. Int Endod J 1996, 29; 365-369.
4. Libfeld H, Rotstein I. Incidence of four-rooted maxillary second molar: literature review and radiographic survey of 1200 teeth. J Endod 1989, 15:129-131.
5. Malagnino V, Gallottini L, Passariello P. some unusual clinical cases on root anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod 1997, 23:127-8.
6. Alani AH. Endodontic treatment of bilaterally occurring 4 rooted maxillary second molars: case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2003, 23:733-5.
7. Shin SJ, Park JW, Lee JK, Hwang SW. Unusual root canal anatomy in maxillary second molars: two case reports. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Dec; 104(6):e61-5. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
8. Barbizam JV, Riberio RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod 2004, 30:668-671.
9. Baratto-Filho F, Fariniuk LF, Ferreira EL, Pecora JD, Cruz-Filho AM, Sousa-Neto MD. Clinical and macroscopic study of maxillary molars with two palatal roots. Int Endod J 2002, 35:796-801.
10. de Almeida-Gomes F, Maniglia-Ferreira C, dos Santos RA. Two palatal root canals in a maxillary second molar. Aust Endod J. 2007 Aug; 33(2):82-3.
11. Ulusoy OI, Görgül G. Endodontic treatment of a maxillary second molar with 2 palatal roots: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct; 104(4):e95-7. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
12. Deveaux E. Maxillary second molar with two palatal roots. J Endod 1999; 25:571-3.
13. Pasternak Júnior B, Teixeira CS, Silva RG, Vansan LP, Sousa Neto MD. Treatment of a second maxillary molar with six canals. Aust Endod J. 2007 Apr; 33(1):42-5.
14. Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35:478-85.
15. Lee JS. Root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary second molars using a cleaning method. J Korean Assoc Conserv Dent 1980; 6:83-7.
16. Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the Mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod 1990; 16:311-7.
17. Stone LH, Stoner WF. Maxillary molars demonstrating more than one palatal root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1981; 51:649-52.